SiT! Bugs - SiT!
View Issue Details
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0001160SiT!i18npublic2010-03-20 11:462010-07-03 16:36
ReporterTomse 
Assigned Toivan 
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityalways
StatusassignedResolutionopen 
PlatformBSDOSFreeBSDOS Version6.4+Later
Product VersionCurrent SVN 
Target VersionFixed in Version 
Summary0001160: 2 strings that are supposed to be the same are not
Descriptionin the bottom of the attached file the 2 strings (if excluding the SLA: are supposed to be the same,

the SLA line consists of 3 strings strSLA: strOpened strByX
and the second line consists of strOpenedByX

I don't know if the 2 strings in the upper line are used elsewhere but at least using the same string gives a sense of streamlining
Steps To Reproduce
Additional Information
TagsNo tags attached.
Relationships
related to 0000742resolved paulh Consolidate SLA updates and their text 
related to 0000035confirmed  Status changes in body text 
Attached Filespng incident_details2.png (79,602) 2010-03-20 11:46
http://bugs.sitracker.org/file_download.php?file_id=99&type=bug
png
Issue History
Date ModifiedUsernameFieldChange
2010-03-20 11:46TomseNew Issue
2010-03-20 11:46TomseFile Added: incident_details2.png
2010-03-20 11:56ivanNote Added: 0002739
2010-03-20 11:56ivanRelationship addedrelated to 0000742
2010-03-20 11:57ivanRelationship addedrelated to 0000035
2010-03-20 12:41TomseNote Added: 0002741
2010-03-20 17:51ivanNote Added: 0002755
2010-03-20 17:51ivanTarget Version3.60 LTS =>
2010-03-20 17:51ivanAssigned To => ivan
2010-03-20 17:51ivanStatusnew => confirmed
2010-07-03 16:36paulhStatusconfirmed => assigned

Notes
(0002739)
ivan   
2010-03-20 11:56   
These are actually separate and have slightly different meanings, although it's subtle.

The first message (chronologically) indicates that the incident is open, the second message indicates that the SLA has started timing the incident.

In reality both messages always appear at the same time and we've already logged an issue to merge these, see 0000742
(0002741)
Tomse   
2010-03-20 12:41   
I was thinking more that the result would look like

strSLA: strOpenedByX
strOpenedByX

rather than
strSLA: strOpened strByX
strOpenedByX

if that gives any better meaning
(0002755)
ivan   
2010-03-20 17:51   
There's nothing we can do to fix this for 3.60