SiT! Bugs - SiT!
View Issue Details
0000644SiT!otherpublic2009-04-14 21:102009-08-16 14:38
paulh 
paulh 
normalfeatureN/A
closedfixed 
3.45 
3.503.50 
0000644: Edit inventory details
you cant currently change the username or password on an inventory item
No tags attached.
Issue History
2009-04-14 21:10paulhNew Issue
2009-04-14 21:25kieranNote Added: 0000912
2009-04-14 21:54paulhNote Added: 0000913
2009-04-14 22:01kieranNote Added: 0000914
2009-04-14 22:15ivanNote Added: 0000915
2009-04-15 09:39paulhNote Added: 0000916
2009-05-14 20:27paulhNote Added: 0001058
2009-05-14 20:27paulhAssigned To => paulh
2009-05-14 20:27paulhStatusnew => assigned
2009-05-14 20:27paulhProduct Version => 3.45
2009-05-14 20:27paulhTarget Version => 3.50
2009-05-14 20:28paulhNote Added: 0001059
2009-05-14 20:28paulhStatusassigned => resolved
2009-05-14 20:28paulhResolutionopen => fixed
2009-05-14 20:28paulhFixed in Version => Current SVN
2009-05-14 20:48kieranNote Added: 0001062
2009-05-14 20:55paulhNote Added: 0001063
2009-08-16 13:17ivanFixed in VersionCurrent SVN => 3.50
2009-08-16 14:38ivanNote Added: 0001579
2009-08-16 14:38ivanStatusresolved => closed

Notes
(0000912)
kieran   
2009-04-14 21:25   
I think it was a deliberate choice at the time but I can't really think of a decent reason why not.
(0000913)
paulh   
2009-04-14 21:54   
yeah I just needed to change a password on one and couldn't do the the information being held is inaccurate
(0000914)
kieran   
2009-04-14 22:01   
I wonder if it'd be useful/possible to have ajax inline editing in our new form handler. For cases like this, we'd only need the one form.
(0000915)
ivan   
2009-04-14 22:15   
Yes useful, but of course would need somebody to code it ;)

I'm not sure how the backend part would work, obviously there needs to be something for the ajax call to talk to, we'd need some way of doing that.

Possible though.
(0000916)
paulh   
2009-04-15 09:39   
Would be good though we could be trying to run before we can walk on this one.

Probably best to get the form stuff working and then extend it
(0001058)
paulh   
2009-05-14 20:27   
If the Privacy is none (i.e. everyone then no one can change the username/password) will fix now
(0001059)
paulh   
2009-05-14 20:28   
trunk r5374 resolves this
(0001062)
kieran   
2009-05-14 20:48   
Should non-owners be able to set the visibility?
(0001063)
paulh   
2009-05-14 20:55   
Interesting point, theres quite a few security issues with the invetory page as even though it may be marked private/admin only if you do edit={$id} you can get some details (e.g. address) when you shouldn't have access, will raise a new bug for that
(0001579)
ivan   
2009-08-16 14:38   
Released in 3.50rc1