0001677: Contract page inconsistant when SLA changed from non-timed to timed

View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ]

[ Issue History ] [ Print ]

Project

Category

View Status

Date Submitted

Last Update

0001677

SiT!

billing

public

2011-08-08 15:11

2013-07-06 17:08

Reporter

ivan

Assigned To

paulh

Priority

normal

Severity

minor

Reproducibility

have not tried

Status

resolved

Resolution

fixed

Platform

OS Version

Product Version

Current GIT

Target Version

3.90beta1

Fixed in Version

Current GIT

Summary

0001677: Contract page inconsistant when SLA changed from non-timed to timed

Description

If a contract is created with an SLA that is not timed at all and then later the SLA is changed to Timed, the contract page and the edit balance/edit service pages show unexpected results.

One would expect that the service that was originally created does not have billing. If that is the case it should not be possible to edit the balance, or if it is possible it should also be possible to edit billing parameters on the service.

Steps To Reproduce

* Create a new contract against an SLA that is not timed
* Change the SLA to be timed for at least one priority
* View the contract page and see the balance for the service is 0.00
* Click 'Edit Service'
* see that it is not possible to edit the service with relation to billing
* return to the contract page
* Click 'Edit Balance'
* Add 100.00 to the balance
* return to the contract page
* see the balance for the service is now 100.00
* Click 'Edit Service'
* see that it is not possible to edit the service with relation to billing

Additional Information

Also, if a subsequent service record is created, there is no option given for billing parameters. I presume this is related.

Tags

No tags attached.

Attached Files

Relationships

Notes
(0004190) ivan (administrator) 2011-08-08 15:12	Perhaps it should not be possible to change an SLA timed/non-timed once it's being used?

(0004773) paulh (administrator) 2013-04-21 19:31	034e941 prevents you from changing a contract from timed to non timed (or vica versa) as I agree this is a bad idea and will lead to a confusion etc

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2011-08-08 15:11	ivan	New Issue
2011-08-08 15:12	ivan	Note Added: 0004190
2013-04-21 19:31	paulh	Note Added: 0004773
2013-04-21 19:31	paulh	Assigned To	=> paulh
2013-04-21 19:31	paulh	Status	new => resolved
2013-04-21 19:31	paulh	Resolution	open => fixed
2013-04-21 19:31	paulh	Fixed in Version	=> Current GIT
2013-07-06 17:08	ivan	Target Version	=> 3.90beta1