| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2019-12-07 23:46 GMT |  |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||||
| 0000383 | SiT! | billing | public | 2009-01-09 19:30 | 2011-08-06 17:00 | ||||||||
| Reporter | paulh | ||||||||||||
| Assigned To | |||||||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A | ||||||||
| Status | confirmed | Resolution | open | ||||||||||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||||||
| Product Version | |||||||||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||||||
| Summary | 0000383: Lock 'old' services | ||||||||||||
| Description | Might be useful if services could be locked so no more billable items can be charged against them. Could do this automatically as well on services with <= $0 on them when a new service is added | ||||||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||||||
 Relationships |
|
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
 (0004147)Tomse (developer) 2011-08-06 14:14 |
this would be useful |
 (0004169)ivan (administrator) 2011-08-06 17:00 |
Yeah, locking could also prevent editing the service. And also editing/transferring the balance. Maybe rather than call it a lock, "inactive" may be better since that's the term we use for other items in SiT!. |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2009-01-09 19:30 | paulh | New Issue | |
| 2011-08-06 14:14 | Tomse | Note Added: 0004147 | |
| 2011-08-06 14:14 | Tomse | Assigned To | => Tomse |
| 2011-08-06 14:14 | Tomse | Status | new => confirmed |
| 2011-08-06 16:17 | Tomse | Assigned To | Tomse => |
| 2011-08-06 17:00 | ivan | Note Added: 0004169 | |
|
Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2019 MantisBT Team |
|